The First Cause

Sunday, January 20, 2008

Peter The Disciple

I'm not sure why but the Lord often puts Peter on my mind. Probably because I feel like I can relate in a lot of ways with Peter as I'm sure most Christians can at some point in their walk with the Lord.

I kinda laugh at Peter because he is very outspoken, is not afraid to say whats on his mind and has a tendency to be slightly arrogant and can easily become full of himself. This, the outspokenness and arrogance, often results in putting foot in ones own mouth. Peter did this on a number of occasions.

One example that I can give is on the occasion when Jesus had asked the Disciples " Who do Men say that I, the Son of Man, am?" and they all said one thing or another as to what folks were saying about Jesus.

Jesus listened to them and then asked, "Well who do you say that I am?" Now Peter finally speaks up and makes a remarkable comment saying " You are the Christ, Son of the living God." Jesus hears this and immediately begins to poor out onto Peter all these blessings and promises and heavenly gifts like the "keys of the kingdom of heaven" and powers to bind things and to loose things in heaven and earth and WoW!! Can You imagine what was going on in Pete's head? He was so full of himself he could barely stand up from weight of his head!! I assure you he was not going out the same way he came in without them first removing the wall so he could get his head out the building.

Peter had been waiting and wanting to receive such adulation's from Jesus and now he finally was getting what he wanted. "Yep, Jesus knows... I am the Man, I'm it brother and don't forget it." (Spiritual self righteousness)

on my next entry I will continue the story and how Jesus deals with Peters self-righteousness.

Saturday, December 22, 2007

to blog or not to blog ..That is the question

I Read Wills blog "the bible in context" today. He does a pretty good job of explaining the Classical Christian view against the Armenian view. Good stuff. Hey if it makes you dig in deeper into scriptures to answer some questions then I say it's Good to review critical and sometimes controversial points of view. (At least for me it is)

Rachel bought me a "Read in a year" Bible for my birthday in 1992. I finished reading it yesterday.
After Curious George and The One Year Bible I will now attempted my third book, beginning tomorrow... "The 2008 addition of Websters Dictionary".

Well I hope someone reads this cause I haven't written in here for some time.

Leave a comment if you do.

Sunday, March 25, 2007

I don't know if most of you know it or not but I left the Grocery business last November. I am a sales rep for Ridgley Distributors working four days a week for them and on Wednesdays and Saturday I usually work for Metz Electric wiring new homes. I really like working for Metz Electric and would hope that some day be able to do electrical work full time.

Ridgley distributors is a Beer distributorship owned by some faulks who are close friends of Kim's Mom and Dad. They offered me a job with them and I took it cause things in the Grocery business were getting a little out of hand in regards to customer service and pay roll. Not enough of either Creating more pressure on the Management team to do more of the work.

That's it for now talk to more later.

Thursday, March 22, 2007

Staying up with New Posts

Rebekah wrote a comment on my last blog ribbing me about not posting for sometime. Will gave me a hard time too; by the way Will, thanks for the email on my B-day. I didn't want you to think I didn't get it. Anyway, I'll try one more time to at least write a post once a week and If I do well with that then Maybe I'll write more often.

If you haven't read Rebekah's blog yet I suggest you do so (http://simpleandsassy.blogspot.com/). Pleasantly surprised, she has some pretty good posts. Very entertaining and creative. although I could do without the "aiky breaky heart" thing. I don't care for that song. It ranks right up there with " She thinks my tractors sexy". Top of the list of cornball country songs.

while I'm at it you might as well read Rachel's blog too(http://www.rachelhauck.com/). She has a really good post about lies and were they take us if we invest in them emotionally and spiritually and why we shouldn't invest in them at all. As always Rachel's blogs are always Good with a Capital "G"; but then again she is a Pro and the rest of us are just Wanna-Be's living in her world.

Last but not least read Will's blog(http://donaldsonfamily.blogspot.com/). His and Deanna's most recent post is pretty good and thought provoking. It's good when you hear of someone standing up for Faith and Righteousness.

Hey, be sure to read this post before you read the other blogs. That way you won't have to read theirs twice.

Wednesday, December 20, 2006

Latest Update

Yep Will is right, this update is way over do. It's just difficult to get back in the habit of writing more often.

A lot has happened around here as far as I am concerned. Quit my job at Martins foods and began a new job for Ridgley Distributors. They are a beer distributor for Millers and Coors and a variety of imports. My responsibilities consist of presale and merchandising. So far so good and I love the hours, 7 to 4 with Wednesdays and week ends off. The only drawback is I took a pretty good pay cut but it does offer me the opportunity to do and pursue some other interest on my days off.

this is good for now and I'll try once again to write more often, besides it's time for me to pick Kendall up from school so I'll talk more later.




Thursday, September 21, 2006

People can be weird!!

My brother Danny sent an email to me with the following attachment. It's a 911 call from a lady who is at Burger King and is complaining about the poor service. She acually wants the 911 dispatcher to send the sheriff out to the BK.
How ridiculous and sad at the same time.

http://www.break.com/index/burger_king_911.html

Sunday, September 10, 2006

It's been a long time!

Well, I feel like Rip vanwinkle. I mean It's only been 3 months sense our last post.
I promise I will write more often here going forward and not so heavy a topic all the time.
I Guess you could say this is kind of a new start.

My sister has a blog, which you should visit, http://www.rachelhauck.com/ and she wrote a piece about girls peeing on the toilet seat because girls are afraid to sit on public toilet seats.
Oh brother !! That is just ridiculous. I mean for most guys we really don't want to hear about girls dribbling on the toilet seat. That's Just gross! Heck why stop there lets just get rid of all taboos. Lets talk about how those pads stick to ......I think I'm going to throw up thinking about that too.

I do have to say this though. I work in retail and there is one thing over the past 20+ years that has never changed in the store and that is how nasty the women's restrooms are left by women. Wow! Everything from a whole roll of paper towels shoved into the toilet to diarrhea all over the toilet and up the wall, clear to the ceiling, no kidding. Ha! and you say that men are pigs, fooey on that.

Hey guys, the next time you feel pressured to put the seat up because you've been brain washed to do so, forget about it!!

Thursday, June 01, 2006

The Personality of the Holy Spirit

There are a lot of Christians and other religious sects or cults, specifically Jehovah Witness, that either have a misunderstanding or just a blatant disregard for who the Holy Spirit is. It seems that a lot of Christians see the Holy Spirit as a necessary tool that the Father and the Son utilize to accomplish their will. Or that the Holy Spirit is important but not as important as the work of the Father or the sacrifice of the Son. I know from experience that I have heard much more preaching on the Father and the Son than I have on the Holy Spirit. This needs to be very balanced.

The Jehovah Witness’ believe that the Holy Spirit is nothing more than the impersonal power of God. In other words, the Holy Spirit is the force that the Father creates when He performs an action. An example of this would be when a baseball player throws a ball. They would say that if the player is God then the Holy Spirit is the power in the body that throws the ball. What this does is totally disregard the Trinity. They have to do this in order to stand on their argument that Jesus is a god who was created by God. Arguing with a Jehovah Witness is usually pretty pointless other than developing your own abilities of discussion but if you are able to show them the personality of the Holy Spirit you will have rocked their world and hopefully get them on the right track. The best way to stand your ground against a Jehovah Witness is to know the Scriptures.

Anyway, I have compiled another list of Scriptures. I did not dive into any specific discussion but instead created a reference list to use for future study and discussion and to show the personality of the Holy Spirit. At the very base this is just to show that the Holy Spirit is every part of the Trinity that the Father and Son are and that He is not just an impersonal force that doesn’t have a will or isn't able to accomplish an independent action. So here are a few of His characteristics.

Teaches- Luke 12:12, John 14:26, John 2:27
Intelligence- John 14:26, John 15:26, Romans 8:16
Imposes His will- Acts 16:7, 1 Corinthians 12:11
Affections- Isaiah 63:10, Ephesians 4:30
Creates- Genesis 1:2
Strives- Genesis 6:3
Witness’ or testifies- John 15:26, Acts 5:32, Hebrews 10:15
Judges- John 16:8
Commands- Acts 8:29, 13:2
Raises the dead- Romans 8:11
Searches- 1 Corinthians 2:10-11
Indwells- Ephesians 2:22, Ezekiel 36:27, John 14:17, Romans 8:9, 1 Corinthians 3:16
Empowers- Acts 1:8
Takes on an offense- Acts 5:3, Ephesians 4:30
Guides- Acts 10:19-20
Chooses works- Acts 16:6
Gives life- John 6:63, Romans 8:11, 2 Corinthians 3:6, 1 Peter 3:18
Guides truth: John 16:13
Juxtaposition with the apostles, Christ, Father and Son- Acts 15:28, John 16:14,
Matthew 28:19, 2 Corinthians 13:14, 1 Peter 1:1-2

Thursday, May 18, 2006

Previous Post !

The previous post is an email composed by my brother Pete (firemedic143). Pete also writes on this blog and the email that I posted is very clear and has some really good examples in regards to "election" and "Free Will". Although its a long post, Pete does a great job in summing up the argument for election in a relatively short letter.

The email /letter also goes hand in hand with his post " A Study in Verses" where he gives some scriptures that are relative to the topic of "free Will" and "Election".

Great Job Pete and Keep up the good work.

A Clear Definition from Pete

As far as my compilations of these verses that is more or less all that it is. I have not, as of yet, put them together in a systematic way but they all have to do with the Lord’s choosing. Some are not as clear or direct as others but they do serve to support other verses. What I have done is every time I find a verse that regards election, choice, or predestination I would just jot it down. If I was to put them in full context then I would have a whole lot more verses laid down. I just wrote down the key verse so that I would know were to go and the context would be around it.&a mp;n bsp; There are a lot more in the OT that I have not gotten to yet. Anyway, I will do my best to try to answer your e-mail.

Jesus did not ask anyone to follow Him. He simply commanded, “Come and follow Me”. There was not an opportunity for the disciples to choose. There is no scriptural evidence to support the idea that the disciples had an opportunity to choose. Jesus said to come and follow and the disciples immediately stopped what they were doing and followed. Otherwise, the word and power of God is dependant on the will of man which would make man ultimately in control and God would not be sovereign. Now, human logic would say that the disciples obviously had to choose because t hey got up from where they were at and followed as opposed to just sitting there and not to following. Jesus, however, did not ask but commanded. The disciples were compelled to follow by the power and grace of God. God did not ask light to come forth, He commanded. Jesus did not ask Lazarus to come forth, He commanded and he came. Lazarus did not have a choice but to obey. It is an oxymoron to say that Jesus “elected” but the disciples “chose”. If the disciples “chose” then Jesus could do no more than ask. If Jesus “elected” then there has to be a cause and effect to the word and power of God.&a mp;nb sp; They had no choice but to choose, if that helps. To say that the “election” of God can be thwarted by the “choice” of man is to nullify the power and will of God.

This is not to be confused with the daily exercise of your salvation. There are only two people, those who are slaves to sin and those who are slaves to Christ. Having said that, now that I am in Christ, I have an obligation to serve him to the best of my ability. I can serve him vigorously or I can serve him lazily. The Lord can and has compelled me to do things, knowingly and unknowingly, but even though I am His slave this in not the norm but the Lord does have control so that His will is ultimately accomplished. I definitely have a part in my service to the Lord but this is post salvation. The Lord is going to accomplish what He wants; I now have the ability to serve Him where as before I did not.

If it was prophesied that Judas would betray Jesus but that Judas had a choice then not only is the prophecy irrelevant but it is by definition not a prophecy at all. A prophecy is a declaration of what will happen, not what may or may not happen. If there is a prophecy that does not happen then it is a false prophecy. To say that a prophecy may or may not happen means that it is nothing more than a guess. A prophecy is not hanging in limbo to be determined if it is true or false. A prophecy is determined when it is spoken and confirmed when it is accomplished. Judas confirmed that the prophecy was true. Jonah’s prophecy, however, was not accomplished because the Lord had mercy. This is not to say that he was a false prophet but that the Lord was merciful and His will was done.

Pre: earlier than, prior to, before, in advance, beforehand, in front of, anterior to. Destine: to decree beforehand, to designate, assign, or dedicate in advance, to direct, devise, or set apart for a specific purpose or place. To say that that God predestined everything but that man has to choose is another oxymoron and is completely contrary to the definition of predestination. Predestine: to destine, decree, determine, appoint, or settle beforehand. Predestine is actually a double positive. The prefix and the root mean the same thing and one reinforces the other. To predestine something is to determine and establish what will happen first, not what might happen or knowing what will happen and then go back in time and say that such and such is going to happen. God does not find out what we will do and then declare predestination because then it is no longer predestination. Preknowledge is not predestine but predestine does contain preknowledge. Predestine says that God knows what will happen because He is the one who determines what will happen. Predestination is the base of foreknowledge. Foreknowledge cannot be the base of predestination because you cannot know what will happen if nothing has been determined yet. God cannot say; even though I have not created or determined anything, I know what will happen. What y ou are saying is that although God created everything He did not know everything that He created, therefore, He looked into the future, saw what would happen, and then went back before time began and said this is what I want to have happen. That is like getting a score on a test that you haven’t taken and then take the test in order to get the score to come out right.

This might help a little. When God rested on the 7th day he did not just take a break. It says that He rested from “all” His work. The Lord created the beginning and end of time and everything in between. We are just here at this point in time but the Lord is already in tomorrow. He is not going through time with us nor is He waiting around for events to take place. He does not know the future simply because He is omniscient but because He is the author of all creation. God did not create us arbitrarily, look into the future, learn what the outcome would be, and then say that is what he predestin ed. Everything that happens is in accordance to the plan that God had before time began.

The scriptures are clear. If man were left to make the choice then no one would be saved. Yes there is a universal call to repentance but there is a difference between simply doing what is right and becoming a servant of the Lord. Man is by nature opposed to righteousness. This is not to say that a sinner can’t do a righteous act but he does lack the ability to worship and give glory and honor to God and to lead a righteous life by following the Lord.

God knows the outcome because it is His plan. If you believe like the Unitarians that God set the world in motion but only knows what the outcome is because He is omniscient then why has He performed miracles? If there are miracles then Lord is performing them for a reason. Is it to manipulate time and space in order to make sure that events turn out like He has foreseen or are they a part of His plan? I would suggest the latter.

All of this usually boils down to the same old Armenian question of what is the point if everything is predetermined. Why should I be a witness if everyone has already been determined heaven or hell. Well, there are a lot of reasons. The first one is that the Lord has commanded that I be a witness and preach the gospel. This is all that any believer needs. I find it incredibly ludicrous for believers to think that is not enough and need a better reason. I can’t remember the verse but Paul makes an assertion that he preaches so that the elect and hear it and believe. It is not for us to question why but to d o and die (Emmerson). It is not my responsibility to build the church. Jesus said, “I will build my church”. It is my responsibility to say, here I am Lord, use me. I am nothing more than a tool in His hand.
I am also compelled to be a witness. I know that I can sit in a closet for the rest of my life and still go to heaven but that is impossible for me to do. Now that I am bought and paid for and are a new creature, I have to serve the Lord not only from duty but from desire. I could run off and be the prodigal son but I know that I would return from the swine sooner or later. Not because the Lord needs me to fulfill His will but because I need Him. I witness not because He needs me to but because I am his servant, I love Him, and I want please Him.
I think that one of the reasons that people question why is that they really do not understand what the main purpose of creation and salvation. We were created for one sole purpose and that is to worship, praise, and glorify God and enjoy Him forever. We screwed that up. The only way that we would be able to praise and worship Him in the heavenly places is through the plan of salvation. The fact that Jesus would have to die was in the plan in the beginning. Jesus did not decide to humble Himself only after man fell. The fact that you and I will get to live forever in paradise is a byproduct of the real purpose. Jesus did not confine Himself to bodily form, suffer and die so that we would simply not get what we deserve. The purpose of salvation was planed from the beginning so that the Father could give a love gift to His Son by the Holy Spirit. We are the bride of Christ so that we can worship Him in glory forever and ever and ever. We have not been saved so that the Lord could glorify us. That is secondary.



If free choice is true and we are all equally sinners then how can some have the ability to follow Christ and others not? How can I have the ability to choose God when I am no better than a drunken, murderous, fornicator who dies in his sin? It is more than arrogant to say that I am smart enough or good enough to choose Christ but that someone else is not, or that I am not as bad of a sinner as someone else. God does not qualify sin.
One of the questions that free choice people often bring up is, “Well what makes you so special that God would choose you?” First of all, you will have to ask Him. This is His idea not mine. Second, the Scriptures say that He has chosen the weak and foolish things of this world. He has not chosen me because I am stronger and wiser but because I am weaker and foolish.

Here are a few of the things that are either fundamentally wrong with free will or that cause much disturbance.
1. God would not have a plan for the world or even for my life. Simply knowing what the outcome would be does not constitute as a plan. If God does not have a plan for His people then you need to throw out about 5% of the Scriptures, if not more.
2. If God does have a plan then it would be dependant on the will of man. This is no plan at all. If God thinks that man is going to get it right than He is a bigger fool than I am.
3. The scriptures state that there is none who is righteous; there is none who seek after God. The validity of the scriptures would then be in question. Man is not saved on his righteousness but on the righteousness of Christ.
4. All infants who die are in hell without hope.
5. All aborted babies either elective or natural are in hell without hope
6. All of the OT saints, including John the Baptist, are in hell without hope
7. There is no doctrine of free will. At best there is only an elaborate justification.
8. Saying that the Lord could not save me without my approval stinks of self-righteousness pride which was Adams downfall in the beginniging.
9. A lot of people think that election is not fair. That is exactly right. God is not fair. He is Just and Merciful and praise God He is not fair. If He was fair then everyone would get what they deserve. Is there anyone who deserves heaven? No. Does everyone deserve Hell? Yes .
10. Salvation can be picked up and dropped whenever the individual decides, like walking through a gate. Jesus died once for your sins. He cannot die a second time. I forgot where that verse is. It may be in the list.

Another complaint by free will is that it is not really true love if you have to force someone to love you. I agree. Unfortunately this has nothing to do with election and predestination. Did you force your wife to love you? No. Did you conduct yourself in such a way that your wife does love you? Yes. Can you say that she still had to choose to love you? No. She did have to choose to commit to you in marriage but that was after she already loved you. She came to love you and she didn’t even realize it until it was to late (poor girl). She never decided to love you but, she does. Does that make it less? So it is with the Lord. Some people He has poured out His grace, mercy, and love and others He hasn’t. He has not forced me to Love Him but His Love is irresistible. His grace is irresistible.
Still another is prayer. Why would the Lord have us pray if everything is determined? Well, because He said so. I would suppose that most, if not all, of the things that the Lord has us do is for our benefit, not His. The Lord wants us to seek Him out and have a personal relationship with Him. After Adam sinned God asked him where he was. Did God not know? Of course He did, but He was developing His relationship with Adam. Who really knows why the Lord does what He does.
I am sure that you have heard of the analogy of how salvation is like a man who is drowning. Someone throws a life saver to him but it is his choice to either grab hold or not. Or this one, salvation is like a Christmas gift but the man still has to open the present to get the gift. Those are very good analogies except for one minor detail. The man is dead. The analogy is wrong from the base because it is saying that the man is still alive when the Scriptures say otherwise. I have seen plenty of dead people in my job let me tell you, working with a dead man is like working with a 200lb bag of wet hair. We h ave a saying, DRT- dead right there. I have to breathe for him. I have to pump his heart for him. He can do nothing by lay there like a dead slug. You can throw 1,000,000 life savers at this drowning man but it would be the same as throwing mill stone because he is not drowning, he is already drowned. I was not dying in my sin; I was dead in my sin but Christ is the one who made me alive not my ability to say ‘yes’. The only thing you will get out of a dead man is poop and puke and the sound affects that go with it.

Take time to go through those verses and break them down. I still have many questions myself. I know that I will be studying this for the rest of my life and still not have all of the answers. I do not believe election because it makes sense. I believe it because that is what the Bible says. I don’t have to like it; I just have to accept it. It doesn’t have to make perfect sense to me; I just have to believe it.

Sunday, May 14, 2006

A Study of Verses

I have been on a study for the last few years trying to find the verses that are clearly about the doctrine of election vs. verses that are clearly about the idea of free choice or free will. The key word here is “clearly” as there are some verses that are more open to interpretation than others. These verses I left out. For example, many Christians use John 3:16 to show free will. I have found that many people think that this verse means that anyone can come to Christ. The problem, however, is that there is no reference to the word itself or even the idea of “anyone” in that verse. The only definitive argument is the assurance that those who do believe will receive, while there is no suggestion that anyone or everyone can receive.

My conclusions are that while I have found many verses that are clearly support the doctrine of election, I can find no clear verse about free will. I have found a few verses that gave me much pause but upon further study I realized that I was wrong in my initial assessment. An example of this would be Phillipians 3:11-14. I always thought that this was not only about choosing salvation but also about maintaining salvation. Once I learned that a gift (salvation) and a “prize” were not synonymous I realized my error.

Another one would be 1 John 1:9. Some people would read that and say that your salvation is conditional to the word “ if ”. My first answer would be Ephesians 2:1-10 and my second answer would be that this verse is not about conditional salvation but of the assurance that the believer has in his salvation.

Anyway, I have compiled several verses that attest to the doctrine of election. I have an asterisk, *, next to the verses that I would call a pivot verse. Like in basketball when you have a pivot foot you can step anywhere as long as you do not move the pivot foot. Once you do then you are immediately in error. Such is a pivot verse. The verse is so sound and so clear that it cannot be misinterpreted. If I have a verse that I cannot quite understand I know that I can always go back to my pivot verse. As soon as I disregard this verse then I am immediately in danger of misinterpreting another verse, especially one that isn’t very clear or that could easily be misinterpreted.

I will start off with a bonus verse and then I will give you the rest of the list. Some verses will lead to another specific verse. I have looked these up in NASB. I encourage you to print this off and take time to go through the list.

Bonus verse Jn 3:16 à Jn 17:9

Matt 11:27, *15:24, 20:28, 22: 14, 24:22,31, 25:34, 26:28
Luke 4:17-28, 18:7
John 5:21, *6:37-45, *15:16, *17:1-2, 7, 9, 12, 15, 24, 18:4-9
*Acts 2:37-39, 4:27-28, 5:31, *13:48, 20:28
Rom 1:1-7, 4:16-17, Rom 6:23 à Rom 11:29, **8:29-30,33, Rom 9 (all of it), (specifically) *Rom 9:8 à Rom 11:25-29, 9:11, *9:18-23, Rom 9:27 à Rom 11:5,
1 Cor 1:21-31, 6:20, 7:22-24,
2 Cor 4:3-4, 5:17
Gal 3:16-18, 3:26-29, 4:21-31
Eph 1:4-14, *2:1-10, 3:11, 4:7
Phillipians 1:6, 29 Collosians 3:12
1 Thes 1:4, 2 Thes 2:13-14
2 Tim 1:8-9, 2 Tim 2:10
Titus 1:1-2, Heb 1:14, 6:17, 12:17, *James 1:18, 2:5
*1 Peter 1:1-4, 1:20, 2:9, 3:9,18, 2 Peter 1:3,10, Jude 3

*Genesis 15:17-18
Exodus 6:7-8
*Deuteronomy 4:35-38, 7:6-7, 10:15, 14:2, 32:6
2 Samuel 7:23-24, Esther 4:14, Proverbs 16:4
Psalm 4:3, 20:6, 74:2, 105:43, 135:4
Isaiah 41:8-9, 43:1-7,21, 44:1-2, 46:10-13, *53:10-12, 54:6, 55:10-11, 65:1
Jeremiah 1:5, Ezekiel 36:22-32, 37:5-6, *Amos 3:2, Haggai 2:23

Thursday, May 04, 2006

Free Will Part 2

Ok so let me get to it and wrap this up dealing with free will and our ability to choose.

Here is the problem I have with "Free Will". In Romans 3:10-12 paul says " 10 As it is written,
Not even one person is righteous.
11 No one understands.
No one searches for God.
12 All have turned away.
Together they have become worthless.
No one shows kindness, not even one person!

According to Paul not one single person is righteous and no one searches for God. All (meaning everyone) have turned away or sinned against God.

You see, the phrase "Free Will" indicates that we have the ability to choose between sinning and not sinning. Nothing could befurtherr from the truth as the apostlePaullindicatess here; also I'm well versed with personal experiences as I'm sure you are too.

The apostle Paul also indicates that we are DEAD in our sins (Romans 5: 12,Ephesianss 2:1). Someone who is dead has the ability to choose Nothing, except sin.

"I will have mercy on whomever I will have mercy, and I will have compassion on whomever I will have compassion. Romans 9:15.
These are the words of God to Moses as Paul uses them in his letter to the Romans.

Gods Mercy is not obligatory and he will give it to whom he Wills. The only thing that God is bound to is justice and through His justice he is obligated to punish sin.
For those who He chooses to give Mercy He offers up His Son for punishment resulting in salvation and His mercy is given in faith in His son Jesus Christ.

Thursday, April 27, 2006

Free Will, The Ability To Do Nothing But Sin

A Modern and contemporary definition of "Free Will" would be as follows; The ability to act according to ones own desires apart from and independent of the influence or foreknowledge of God.

Another way of putting it is that we are independent agents from God and can make decisions without God knowing about it before hand and be able to resist His ability to influence our decisions.

I completely disagree with this premise and I will go even farther to say that nothing in the world happens without Gods foreknowledge of it or that Nothing happens outside of Gods will.

Ephesians 1:11 says that He works all things according to the counsel of His Will and Psalms 139: 15 and 16 says "My frame was not hidden from You, when I was made in secret, and skillfully wrought from the lowest parts of the earth. Your eyes saw my substance, being yet unformed. And in Your book they all were written, the days fashioned for me when as yet there were none of them. Then we read again in Psalms 33: 15 that He " fashions their hearts individually" and "He considers all their works".

God planned our days before we were even formed and not only that but He also fashions our hearts as individuals.

How typical of man to be offended when he hears that he is not the one in control. In fact we don't even have the ability to control our own sinful nature. We can't stop sinning even when we want to. We are bound to our sin.

Yes, we do Make decisions as to how we will react to each situation in life and God does have foreknowledge of our decisions.

This is very necessary for multiple reasons but the biggest reason for our sake is His assurance that His promises and will be fullfilled and our salvation is ensured.

Thats all for now. Tune in next time when we will dive in a little deeper on this subject.

As Rachel would say, Peace Out.


Friday, March 03, 2006

A man from Iraq

I recently took a bread from Burkhof Sytematic Theology and read " Saddam's Secrets". I highly recommend it. It is not the best literature read but it is very enlightening and encouraging. It is written by General Georges Sada who was in charge of Saddam's air force. He is famous for a lot of things but two of the big ones is that he is known for his incredible honesty and for publically confronting Sadam 17 times and is alive to tell about it. He recently came to our church and I got to meet him and get his autograph in his book. He is currently touring the country with Terry Law and is giving his testimonies in churches all over the United States.

Gen. Sada has been a born again believer since the 60's. No other christian has risen as high in Saddam's rank as he has. For all intense purposes he is the equivalent of a modern day Daniel. He rose in rank in an evil empire by following the Lord. At times when other men would have been killed, Gen. Sada was given grace, respect, and honor.

When I read his book I kept comming to the conclusion that I really didn't know how bad it was in Iraq. I thought it was bad but I didn't really know. I always thought that Saddam was more stupid than he was mean but, no kidding, he excelled in both. His cruelty can only be measured by his stupidity. He surrounded himself with weak men who lived in fear for their lives and their families lives if they did not do what he commanded. His plan was simple. Do what you are told or you will die. You may think that Saddam had people do his dirty work for him but not as much as you would think. If someone was far away then he would either send someone to kill them or have them brought to him to be killed. He also had ex KGB and SS people working for him to do the majority of his tortures and murders. Gen. Sada wrote about how there was a brilliant neurological surgeon who made some off handed comments about Saddam. A couple of weeks later he summoned him, had 50 men trample him to death, and then let starved dogs eat him.

If ever there was a country for a man, Iraq was it. There really was no Iraq. There was only Saddam. He didn't have to confir with anyone. The country did as Saddam did. It was nothing for him to starve hundreds of thousands of people so that he could do what he wanted. People lived in fear every day. Someone may not even be against him but could very easily be a target of his desires. I or anyone is fooling themselves if they think that they could really know what it was like if you haven't lived it.

Getting back to Gen. Sada. He is solely responsible for saving potentially millions of lives. During the first war, Saddam had the plan in place to attack Israel with WMD. Gen. Sada was the only one who stood up and confronted Saddam. Had he been afraid of his own life and not put it on the line, Saddam surely would have followed through with his plan and Irsreal surely would have retaliated with extreme prejudice. Saddam didn care. His idea was that if he is going down then he will take as many friend or foe with him.

It is amazing how one single person could have affected the world in such a dramatic and deadly way. If you were to release Charles Manson and give him complete immunity from any further actions and then give him a country, you would have an idea of what Sadam was doing or wanted to do. It seems that the only restraint that Sadam had was Gen. Sada. Only by the divine grace of God could Sada do what he did. His actions were no less than the actions of Daniels friends when they wouldn't bow down. Qusay, one of Sadam's sons, actually ordered the execution of Gen. Sada but here he is today.

The biggest impression that I got from Gen. Sada was not that he was a great warrior for the Kingdom of God but that he was a humble man who was only loyal to his Savior no matter what the cost. That in turn made him a great warrior for the Kingdom of God.

If you want to know what was really going on then get his book.

Tuesday, February 21, 2006

Daytona 500

Yes I know, this is the second post in as many days and your right that's unusual for me. I have some extra free time this week which lends me time to write.

Now let me get to the topic here. If you watched Daytona 500 on Sunday like I did, I hope that you were enraged as much as I was with the performance of Tony Stewart. I thought that maybe he had changed some from his performance in years past were he just seemed to be incapable of controlling his anger and vengeance. Last year he seemed to be more in control of himself but I see that it was because he was winning a lot last year. On Sunday the old Tony came out with a vengeance.

Earlier in the week Tony complained about the aggressive driving that had taken place in the last couple of years and that if something wasn't done someone was going to get killed. Nascar officials reacted and agreed with Tony. They made it very clear at the drivers meetings that they were not going to tolerate over aggressive driving and penalize those who did so.

I guess Tony thought that the Nascar warnings applied to everyone but him. By lap 20 he was crashing people into the wall and blaming the other drivers for his actions. It started with Jeff Gordon on lap 20. Jeff got in front of Tony by sliding up the track in front of him. Jeffs' move did pinch Tony a little. Well Tony was not going to have any of that and instead of tapping his breaks and giving Jeff some room he clipped the rear of Jeffs' car and sent them both into the wall. It damaged Jeff's car more than Tonys' and Jeff admitted to some fault for the incident but Tony would not assume any blame at all. In a word...Classless.

The worst incident was with Matt Kenseth. I have no idea what Matt did toTony as Tony claimed but what ever it was it wasn't as bad as whatTony did to Matt. The man who claimed that aggressive driving was going to kill someone needs to heed his own words because that's exactly what could have happened as he shoved Matt off the race track at almost 200 miles an hour and caused Matt to spin out in the grass and then slam into the wall.

If you ask me I think Tony needs to be suspended for several races if not band from racing altogether and he needs to go back to spoiled brat angry management classes to learn how to act like a man.

Monday, February 20, 2006

Ultimate Fighting

One of my favorite things to do for entertainment is watch Ultimate Fighting. For those of you who don't know what Ultimate fighting is, I'll explain. It's basically every different type of martial artist competing against each other in hand to hand combat. It's very exciting and exhilarating and I will admit very brutal at times.

Like boxing opponents can be knocked out but unlike boxing, once an opponent has been knocked out or the referee decides that the opponent can't go on the fight is stopped, there is no 8 count and they only wear 4 oz gloves. Boxers use 14 oz gloves. They can kick too and there is no padding on there feet so if someone connects with a kick it's usually over.

Along with boxing there is grappling or wrestling too. Most of the men who are grapplers' are well versed in different types of pins, holds and arm bars or locks. This can easily result in a broken arm or an opponent being choked out from behind if the grappler gets behind their opponent and puts enough pressure on there neck they pass out... game over.

These Men who compete in Ultimate Fighting know very well what they are getting into. They are aware of the dangers and the consequences. Despite the facts I think these men are drawn to this because of the mental and physical challenges that it offers. One on one and the man who uses his brawn with his brains the best, will win.